The Other Side of Online Learning Innovation: 3 Reasons Why Promising Projects Fail in Higher Education

Final Presentation: 
Audience Level: 
All
Session Time Slot(s): 
Institutional Level: 
Higher Ed
Streamed: 
Streamed
Abstract: 

Why do some high-potential, online learning innovations fall so short? This interactive session explores this question through case studies of two actual, failed innovations at a major research university. The audience will be able to pinpoint and avoid hazards contributing to implementation and scale problems in higher and postsecondary education. 

Extended Abstract: 

Online learning innovations hold great promise for the future of higher education. However, not every ambitious venture into online learning succeeds. Just like in any innovation space, many exhilarating projects die during implementation, or what Govindarajan and Trimble (2010) refer to as “the other side of innovation.” This is the side of online learning projects that holds often invisible yet sizeable hazards that trip up even the most talented faculty and teams. And like corporations, while institutional leaders are putting unprecedented resources toward online initaitives they are also likely paying too little attention to the darker side of innovation.

This session will contribute to the effective design and scale of online learning projects by higher education institutions by engaging in an interactive case study of two real-life, innovations at The University of Texas at Austin. The case studies include projects the author was engaged in, including a faculty-led development of a novel, student-centered social learning tool and a Massive Open Online Course meant to scale the innovative pedagogy of inquiry-based learning. Using a deep dive approach, participants will conduct a systems analysis to uncover reasons why both projects fell short. The author will use Pearson's online engagement tool, Learning Catalytics, to drive engagement with and lead the audience through the analyses.

Participants will explore and come away with at least three generalizable reasons that online learning projects fail to achieve their promise in higher education:

  1. Financial, time, and staff overinvestments during ideation;
  2. Failing to develop a specific strategy for learner transformation; and
  3. The lack of sustainable and scalable business models that are compatible with the multifaceted nature of higher education.  

When successful, online learning innovations can address some of the most wicked, unyielding problems our institutions face. For example, the modality can broaden access for the extant masses of non-consumers of college-level learning. It can leverage artificial intelligence and augmented reality to maximize learning for every student, no matter their geography or demographics; and by doing so, online learning projects can dramatically increase the likelihood of successful college persistence and completion. Finally, if designed elegantly, online learning can offer much more than a means for open and equitable transmission of content – it can transform students’ lives much like our face-to-face classroom experiences. But our aspiring projects can only do so if we can steward them across the thorns, cracks, and crevices inherent in the other side of innovation.

 

Govindarajan, C. & Trimble, C. (2010). The other side of innovation: Solving the execution challenge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 

Conference Session: 
Concurrent Session 8
Session Type: 
Education Session